Author: aLocalCommuter

  • versus Bike Audits

    versus Bike Audits

    You ever feel like you’re being watched? You know that mysterious, “something’s not quite right, but I can’t tell what” feeling? I get that feeling sometimes when I’m biking through some road or neighborhood, and something about it just kinda sucks, but I can’t tell what it is.

    Biking and walking infrastructure audits are great for that sort of thing. They’re a good tool to have in your toolbox (or in your sick, custom, over-the-shoulder Chrome Industries-brand messenger bag) to help unravel that mystery of why some street or bike path or sidewalk just feels bad.

    Bike and walking audits essentially involve observing or traveling along some segment of street or sidewalk or other infrastructure while working through a series of questions. If filling out a worksheet while staring at an ugly road sounds like it might be boring, let me assure you that it is.

    But it can also be super helpful, so give me one rambling blog post worth of your time to show you.

    (You can also jump to the bottom to download our custom street audit worksheet, if you already know what you’re doing)


    If you search the web (/query cyberspace/scan the tubes/etc.) for bike audit tools, there’s a bunch of organizations that have some wonderful, free resources on how to conduct a bicycle or walk audit. Then, when you then dig a little deeper, you’ll notice that a bunch of those resources really just actually point back to the AARP Bike and Walk Audit Toolkits. And for good reason, too. Those toolkits are entirely free to download and print yourself, and they were developed in a collaboration between the folks at AARP and the League of American Bicyclists.

    You get a bunch of retirees at AARP, who certainly now have the time to make this sort of thing, and also seem to care about their community, combined with the incredibly thorough folks from the League, and you’ve got a pretty good result.

    The AARP tools involve a 32-page packet of reading on how to conduct a bike audit, and a 9-page printout of worksheets to use while actually doing the audit. If you’re here, you should just print out and use the worksheets and skip the mega packet.

    There is a lot of detail and exposition in that reading packet, but I think it boils down to:

    1. Pick a place
    2. Bring some friends
    3. It’s not a test
    4. Do something with it

    Let’s take a closer look:

    1. Pick a place

    Doing a bike audit on a highway will probably only reveal things you already know: this is a bad place to bike, there’s no bikers here, and standing here next to a highway with a clipboard and some worksheets while cars rush past feels really dangerous.

    Don’t pick an obvious loser of a spot. Pick a spot that you might actually use during your commute. Pick a spot that divides your commute into “before that weird, scary part” and “after that weird, scary part.” Pick a spot that you know feels wrong, but maybe the detail isn’t there yet. A sidewalk crossing that car drivers don’t seem to care for, or a painted bike lane that no one seems to use. If the scene brings up questions like “why are so many pedestrians bunched up there,” or “why are there so few cyclists using this,” or just “why does this make me feel yucky,” you might have a good spot.

    To be clear, filling out a bike audit worksheet will not immediately grant you a Masters Degree in Urban Design from carssuckonlineuniversity.com, but it might help put details together so you can actually articulate the problem.

    If you know exactly why there’s a problem, this tool probably isn’t right for you and you can move on to Step 4. Otherwise, if you’ve got a spot where things suck but the story about why they suck isn’t quite there, then a bike or walk audit can help.

    Once you’ve got the spot, you’ll need some help putting together the story.

    2. Bring some friends

    Find friends. Some who bike, some who walk, some who wheelchair, some who do any of the above while having a different skin color. Have them all read Step 3 below.

    Go out to the spot you found from Step 1 with your friends, spread out in groups of two or three and start doing worksheets.

    Having a bunch of different perspectives (literal and figurative and cultural and racial and gender and so many more) is good. Some friends will pay more attention to issues that you might not notice. Really bad issues will probably show up in the results for all your friends.

    If you cannot bring yourself to do an activity like a bike audit for the selfless reason that it can help improve cycling and walking for everyone, I grant you permission to do it for the entirely selfish reason that your friends will like you more for showing that you give a sh*t.

    Now, I understand that giving your friends a bunch of worksheets to fill out could remind them of school. School can be a time that so many of us are eager to forget and leave behind. Get ahead of that negativity by showing them them Step 3.

    3. It’s not a test

    You are where you are because you can tell something is wrong about some part of the road or bike path or sidewalk or whatever. These worksheets are meant to help you, they are not meant to quiz you. That means it’s ok (and maybe even good!) to make a mess of them.

    I recommend you try each page. But by no means should you attempt to thoroughly finish each page. As soon as a series of questions on some worksheet start to feel irrelevant, move on.

    There’s no need to jot every detail, tally every pedestrian or count every car. You can save the detailed data collection for later, once you can actually describe the problem. Try each page of the workbook from top to bottom, front to back. Keep moving through the the questions and you’ll eventually stumble onto a few that seem to resonate. That’s where you’ll put in some extra detail.

    Spend an hour or so going through worksheets and taking notes. Afterwards, chat with friends and get their one- or two-sentence summary of what they saw from their vantage point.

    Thank your friends and buy them a beer or cider or NA beverage of their choice for their courage in the face of car domination. Introduce them to this blog. They are already well on their way to indoctrination.

    4. Do something with it

    Once you’ve done the actual, physical, in-person audit and worksheets, congratulations! You’ve done the easy part!

    Combine your notes with those of your friends. Maybe you find that everyone focused in on some single, scary crossing. Or, maybe you all focused on different things that, depending on where you stood, really seemed to be the biggest problem in the area. Those bad features, all put together, make a whole stretch of road feel dangerous. Or maybe it’s not so dangerous, but the design just feels wildly uninviting. Like everyone found themselves standing under a hot sun with no shade trees, nowhere to sit, and roasting next to a big, empty parking lot.

    Again, the goal here is to use these observations to help reveal the problem. It’s gonna be up to you to put together all the notes and comments from everyone and come up with a story of why that intersection (or bike path or crosswalk or whatever) sucks.

    Once you’ve got that story, you gotta go tell it. Invite your alder or city councilperson out to come stand with you and show them the story. Revisit the spot and take detailed notes that hone in on refining that story. Write a letter to your local transit group and ask them what they think. Bring it up at your next local neighborhood meeting. Make a social media post pointing out the absurdity, I bet other people who bike or walk through that areal will find it and be really excited that “someone’s finally talking about this.” It’s pretty amazing all the things you can do in your city or neighborhood once you can really see the problem and have a way to talk about it.


    Madison Bike To Work Club‘s Street Audit

    Those AARP kits are plenty helpful, and probably the best tool for actually doing the job correctly. But I know you wouldn’t be happy unless we also made a version with a little more Madison Bike To Work Club pizzazz:

    Remember, you don’t have to do it perfectly, just enough to see the story.

  • Good Luck, Pedestrians

    Good Luck, Pedestrians

    Crossing the street sucks

    So we made some fun little stickers to help.

    Red Lights

    According to this kind of old pamphlet from the Federal Highway Administration, you probably shouldn’t trust cars to stop. One third of drivers admitted to running a red light in the past 30 days. That doesn’t really give us an idea of how many red lights they ran versus how many they actually stopped at, and it also only includes people who were willing to admit this in a government-run survey.

    I don’t think you should have to be hyper-aware of that fact every time you cross a busy street, but I also don’t think you should die, so here’s a reminder:

    Emails

    What’s maybe even more scary is that a lot of drivers probably don’t realize they’ve just run a red light. In a survey conducted by the car insurance company Nationwide back in March of 2025, one in ten respondents admitted to reading emails on their phone while driving.

    Other random distractions, like playing with the AC controls, skipping to the next Sabrina Carpenter song, yelling at loud children in the back seat, or attempting to put a messy meatball sandwich back together are all probably real reasons that people didn’t realize they’ve run a red light. The email statistic was just the first one I found that fit on a sticker.

    I picture some jerk driving an overbuilt Chevy Yukon, flying through an intersection while they refresh their email app for the 100th time, hoping for a shipping update on the latest plastic thing they were so excited to buy from Amazon, and thinking to themselves “Huh, why did I feel a speedbump in the middle of that intersection? Oh well.” And then they plow onward to their distant suburban home and an unhappy family that only stays together out of convenience.

    Maybe that’s just wishful thinking on my part, but drivers like that are the reason I have to make these:

    Kids

    How bad is it really, though? These behaviors seem problematic, but maybe it’s totally safe and I’m just overreacting.

    According to the CDC’s Web-based Injury Statistics Query And Reporting System (WISQARS), more kids and teens are killed each year in motor vehicle injuries than by gun violence.

    In fact, “Unintentional [Motor Vehicle] Traffic” is the number one leading cause of injury-related death for people between one and 17 years old in the entire country. So, yeah, I think it’s pretty bad.

    I imagine at least some of those were kids crossing the street while some jerk in a Chevy Yukon was checking their email and ran a red light.

    Anyway, good luck out there!

  • Bike Mafia

    Bike Mafia

    Maybe we need to change our name?

    If you don’t live in Madison’s District 19, you may have missed the Alder election drama.

    This guy named Nino ran in the District 19 election to become the district alder. When he filed to run in the election, he lived in District 9. Dude didn’t even live in the district he wanted to lead. State law requires that you live in the district for at least 28 days before the election if you want to be eligible, but for some reason he was added to the ballot.

    Anyway, he lost by nine votes. He used your taxpayer money to demand a recount, and got it for some reason. Again, all this despite being ineligible as a candidate.

    The recount results came in, and he still lost.

    What’s all this got to do with bikes, you ask? Well after losing and then recounting and then losing again, my man here posted this on Nextdoor:

    I’m not sure where to start tearing into this, but the part that makes me most sad is that he went after our friends at Madison Bikes, and not us.

    Madison Bikes does great work, attending city meetings, planning bicycle advocacy events, and generally being nice, helpful people. If you don’t get their weekly newsletter, you totally should! They’re super legit and crime-free, so calling them a mafia doesn’t seem quite right.

    On the other hand, we here at Madison Bike To Work Club are literally yelling at cars and alienating drivers and being general nuisances, and we don’t get accused once? Not even a mention!? Unfair!? I wanna be Bike Mafia!

    I’m officially calling a vote to change our name to Nino’s Bicycle Mafia. No more Madison Bike To Work Club. Maybe we can get the domain name mafia.bike or something. If I lose I’m gonna demand a recount, because apparently you can just do that.

    Alas, I dream of a future where Nino’s Bicycle Mafia gets called out as a lobbyist mafia. Especially if it’s by some rando who didn’t win his local election, ranting away on a mid-tier social media platform. Until then, I guess we’ll just have to be a little more loud and annoying.

  • Pedestrian Beg Buttons Hacked to Imitate Zuck, Musk Voices

    Pedestrian Beg Buttons Hacked to Imitate Zuck, Musk Voices

    Someone in Palo Alto did the Lord’s work by hacking some pedestrian crossing buttons to have them imitate Zuck and Musk’s voices and give a little speech about the terrors they’ve brought to our world.

    These two are up there for “worst voices to listen to while trying to just cross some shitty street.” I guess that’s the point though.

    Here’s another, about cooking our grandparents’ brains with AI slop:

    And a third, this time about the inevitability of it all.

    Having to use a beg button to cross the street already sucks. Why not have it suck a little more with a reality check from two of the worst people.

    I wonder if the beg buttons here in Madison have the same vulnerability. Hmm.

    Credit to Palo Alto Online for bringing this wonderful news to my attention. Check out the full article here:
    https://www.paloaltoonline.com/technology/2025/04/12/silicon-valley-crosswalk-buttons-apparently-hacked-to-imitate-musk-zuckerberg-voices/

  • Transit isn’t a privilege

    Transit isn’t a privilege

    An overlong, excessively critical review of a very short, very dumb opinion in the Wisconsin State Journal


    The Wisconsin State Journal seems to love publishing anti-transit opinion pieces, likely written by some of the worst people living in Madison.

    I don’t plan to link to the article because I’m sure the Wisconsin State Journal gets ad revenue every time someone opens their ad-riddled site. I promise to make sure you get the gist. Their site also hides their content behind a paywall, which lovingly springs up every time you refresh the page or open a new article. If only there was some way (ctrl + p) to get around that paywall (use ctrl + p) and read the content (ctrl + p to open a print preview before the paywall loads).

    Anyway, let’s get started.


    A recent letter to the editor – that someone actually wrote and submitted to the Journal, where real, human editors read through, critically analyzed, and genuinely thought was worth sharing – made an amazing claim. They hope to show us the truth, that “relying on bikes and buses only works for the privileged.” That definitely-true-and-not-completely-inane idea is, in fact, only part of the title of this wonderful piece. It gets even more definitely-true. Let’s watch.

    The first paragraph of this amazing piece starts off with probably the most honest sentence of the entire opinion. Madison’s vision for the future of transportation does indeed put emphasis on reducing reliance on personal vehicles. After this modicum of truth, the article quickly devolves into… something else.


    Moving on, we find that the second paragraph requires the reader to understand some subtlety that I think gets easily lost. The author claims that “People […] pay premium prices for their vehicles.” Although not stated explicitly, I believe the author means to imply that this “premium price” means we must give them deference. They spent money, they deserve it, dammit. Step aside, pedestrian in the crosswalk, here comes a driver who paid a lot for their car.

    If you’re not careful, you might think the author is saying that people who can afford cars are the privileged ones. My poor, unenlightened reader, you are wrong. It’s those who CANNOT shell out most of their paycheck for a car payment that are the privileged among us.

    Within that same paragraph is another line with an equally challenging concept. Fret not, for I am here to guide us through. Here, the author reminds us of Madison’s often-difficult and constantly changing weather. They remind us that “driving provides a comfort that bikes and waiting for buses cannot.”

    Now! Dear reader! You’ve got practice at this. Who is privileged here: the bikers and bus riders out in the snow and rain, or the drivers with all their “comfort?”

    Correct. It’s those biking and busing. We ought to feel bad for the poor car drivers.


    Alas, I must move on from the second paragraph, although there could be so much more to say about it. We still have two more paragraphs full of supposed ideas, alleged sentence-structure, and a fair amount of punctuation to get through.


    The next segment aims to make the argument that the city must prepare for the influx of new residents, all of whom must be coming in with vehicles and all of whom deserve space for their cars more than anything else. It is indisputable that Madison is growing and will continue to grow. But how we should prepare for that growth is clearly disputable. And, my dear reader, I think this author has it figured out.

    It is not as if people will choose to move to Madison in part for it’s existing bike and pedestrian infrastructure. Or the fact that they might be able to get to and from their new job without needing a car. No. They move here for the promise of vehicular freedom, which the city wants to take away. The isthmus only has so much space, and it should be used for cars. Forget the lack of housing, we need more lanes. A patio in front of your favorite pub? Outdoor parks for picnics? More like parking lots that just don’t know it yet. My personal opinion from piecing together this author’s scattered genius, is that we ought to Pave Lake Monona for additional parking spaces.


    In your next local election Vote To Pave The Lake. If you don’t, then you’re letting privileged pedestrians and radical cyclists win.


    Moving on to our final argument of this work-of-art: the author tells us that “Madison is well-positioned for traffic growth.” There is no mention of what that means, or why it is something we could possibly want. But we must trust the author that this is good. Traffic is growing, and you, too, can be part of it. The city should acquiesce to this rather than encouraging healthier, less expensive, less dangerous forms of getting around.

    We finish this powerful think-piece with a reminder that thinking you can get around without a car is a “shockingly privileged concept.” Given that we’ve reached the end, one might be confused at the lack of any supporting arguments, facts or numbers to back up this opinion. After all, this idea was the core concept the author wanted to convey. Alas, it confuses me too. But I know we must trust the author! Just like we must trust the Wisconsin State Journal! And what I have learned is that if you walked today or took the bus, you should give thanks to a car driver for letting you, you privileged ass.

    And remember: Pave The Lake

  • Hello world!

    Hello world!

    Madison Bike To Work Club is a loose collection of cyclists, pedestrians, commuters and people who like the idea of not needing a car to get around. And now we have a website!

    The lofty goals on this site are, roughly:

    • encourage cycling and bicycle commuting
    • encourage any sort of non-car commuting, really
    • discuss urban design and what it’s like to live near urban areas
    • push for better legislation
    • spread the word

    Some of us believe in a car-free Madison; some of us believe cars will never really go away. Either way, we can agree that the city should be better for those of us trying to get around without a car.

    Welcome to the club